RE: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Date: 2026-09-11 01:51:33
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB12149D2A197E300814238962FF5BE2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Amit, Vignesh,

> Fair enough. But why do we want to change the order of heap_freetuple
> in the following change?

I put heap_freetuple() just before re-obtaining the syscache. But OK for me to
put before LockDatabaseObject(). v3 patch set LGTM.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Chalke 2026-09-11 02:22:04 Re: Add PRODUCT() aggregate function
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-09-11 01:44:37 Re: Fix failing assert in deferred constraint trigger