RE: 019_replslot_limit.pl might fail due to checkpoint skipped

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: 019_replslot_limit.pl might fail due to checkpoint skipped
Date: 2026-08-12 10:31:20
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB12149AAB6AE11A88F6CA35217F5DC2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Fujii-san,

> Thanks for updating the patch! The test changes look good to me.
>
> I also updated the commit message and adjusted the comment for the new
> test. Attached is v3.

Thanks, LGTM. One note: I tried to reproduce the test failure for all supported
branches by [1], but it could not on PG17 and prior ones. Bute ideally it could happen
for all of them.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OS9PR01MB121491143DB264B497B55779BF5D12%40OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2026-08-12 10:54:53 Re: Add a pg_wal_preallocate() SQL function to eagerly create future WAL segments
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-08-12 09:51:57 Re: LibreSSL and OpenSSL separation in libpq to support 1.1.1 deprecation