| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'lakshmi' <lakshmigcdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Masashi Kamura (Fujitsu)" <kamura(dot)masashi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.” |
| Date: | 2026-04-21 07:50:17 |
| Message-ID: | OS9PR01MB12149398DAE5BCB582837AC77F52C2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Lakshmi,
> After applying the patch and rebuilding ecpg, the same statement is now rejected
> during preprocessing with a syntax error. So the patch works as expected.
His patch may work well, but I'm unclear whether it's the correct way to fix.
See my question [1]:
```
IIUC, there is another approach, allowing to specify multiple COUNT clause
in the SET/GET DESCRIPTOR. E.g.,
```
We may have to follow SQL standard or other precompilers like Pro*C.
(Not sure we should spend the effort for the investigation though)
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM | 2026-04-21 07:58:58 | Re: [Bug][patch]: After dropping the last label from a property graph element, invoking pg_get_propgraphdef() triggers an assertion failure |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-04-21 07:40:14 | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures |