| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Noah Misch' <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org" <akapila(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com" <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: REASSIGN OWNED vs. relisshared dep on !relisshared |
| Date: | 2026-08-29 11:16:04 |
| Message-ID: | OS9PR01MB1214927BC0F2BBCD721EDD6CFF5AB2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Noah,
> That works for me. I agree an untracked dependency would be worse than the
> status quo and worse than splitting the catalog. I don't have a strong
> objection to the status quo.
Thanks for the agreement. The implementation has already been done locally,
but I'm planning to start a new thread after the PG19 is stabilized once.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Antonin Houska | 2026-08-29 11:23:51 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) rewrites tables marked with user_catalog_table |
| Previous Message | Ayush Tiwari | 2026-08-29 11:06:13 | Re: PG19 FK fast path: OOB write and missed FK checks during batched |