RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Sergey' <ls7777(at)yandex(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com" <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory
Date: 2026-10-15 03:54:43
Message-ID: OS7PR01MB18317BB8A8A780A460AED8A5DF59C2@OS7PR01MB18317.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi hackers,

I did a self reviewing for 0001 and 0002, and updated the doc a bit.
PSA new patch set.

> If you accept part 1, many users who use logical replication will see
> many messages like “conflict detected on relation” that didn’t exist before.

Sorry, I'm not sure the part, can you please clarify more? When can it happen?

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment Content-Type Size
v16-0001-pg_upgrade-transfer-commit-timestamps-to-the-new.patch application/octet-stream 11.2 KB
v16-0002-Add-pg-commit-ts-option.patch application/octet-stream 4.8 KB
v16-0003-Save-and-restore-roident-and-remote_lsn-for-new-.patch application/octet-stream 10.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-10-15 04:17:28 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-10-15 03:53:48 [PG19] Promotion hangs behind a backend blocked on a stuck client