| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: Parallel Apply |
| Date: | 2026-10-06 06:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | OS7PR01MB18317007E75FEF82988654AF3F5952@OS7PR01MB18317.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Vignesh,
> I was planning to review this patch set and noticed the patch does not
> apply anymore, could you post a rebased version for reviewing?
Thanks for the contact. Here is an updated version.
The version number now becomes v27 by the internal reviews. I adjusted each
patches to work well and pass tests, and fixed test codes to extract the
dependent transaction correctly.
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-10-06 06:38:02 | Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2026-10-06 06:33:57 | Re: WAL segment file descriptor leak on read errors can PANIC the server |