| From: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: row filtering for logical replication |
| Date: | 2021-11-15 06:05:36 |
| Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB6113F72C48995B153A8FCD21FB989@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 7:46 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:03 PM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, November 5, 2021 1:14 PM, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > PSA new set of v37* patches.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for your patch. I have a problem when using this patch.
> >
> > The document about "create publication" in patch says:
> >
> > The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause should contain only columns that are
> > part of the primary key or be covered by <literal>REPLICA
> > IDENTITY</literal> otherwise, <command>DELETE</command> operations will
> not
> > be replicated.
> >
> > But I tried this patch, the columns which could be contained in WHERE clause
> must be
> > covered by REPLICA IDENTITY, but it doesn't matter if they are part of the
> primary key.
> > (We can see it in Case 4 of publication.sql, too.) So maybe we should modify the
> document.
> >
>
> PG Docs is changed in v38-0004 [1]. Please check if it is OK.
>
Thanks, this change looks good to me.
Regards
Tang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-11-15 06:07:33 | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |
| Previous Message | gg pw | 2021-11-15 05:50:02 | Re: Reuse of State value in Aggregates |