RE: Logical Replication vs. 2PC

From: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Logical Replication vs. 2PC
Date: 2021-03-24 07:31:18
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB6113BE506D2E83E9B3208069FB639@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:40 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>I have enhanced the patch for 2PC implementation on the
>subscriber-side as per the solution discussed here [1].

FYI.
I did the confirmation for the solution of unique GID problem raised at [1].
This problem in V61-patches at [2] is fixed in the latest V66-patches at [3].

B.T.W. NG log at V61-patches is attached, please take it as your reference.
Test step is just the same as Amit said at [1].

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1+opiV4aFTmWWUF9h_32=HfPOW9vZASHarT0UA5oBrtGw@mail.gmail.com
[2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPv3X7YH_nDEjH1ZJf5U6M6DHHtEjevu7PY5Dv5071jQ4A%40mail.gmail.com
[3] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JPEoYAkggmLqbdD%2BcF%3DkWNpLkZb_wJ8eqj0QD2AjBTBA%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
Tang

Attachment Content-Type Size
subscriber.log application/octet-stream 77.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2021-03-24 07:32:50 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2021-03-24 07:09:13 Re: pl/pgsql feature request: shorthand for argument and local variable references