RE: typo in doc for "Miscellaneous Coding Conventions"

From: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Tom Lane PostgreSQL <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: typo in doc for "Miscellaneous Coding Conventions"
Date: 2021-05-19 01:09:45
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB6113B133169D2FCAA41FA7CBFB2B9@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

>"were not" is typical usage when stating a contrary-to-fact hypothetical.
> If the implementation (or you) didn’t do X, then Y bad thing could happen.

Really thanks for your kindly reply and explain.
Please forgive me for my poor English. Anyway, got it.

Regards,
Tang

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2021-05-19 14:31:35 Re: Improve documentation for pg_upgrade, standbys and rsync
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-05-19 00:15:45 Re: Error building for 64-bit Windows (10)