RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication

From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Date: 2025-05-26 07:21:38
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB5716792D393A46BF56CDD8E89465A@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:51 PM Xuneng Zhou wrote:

> Thanks for the effort on the patches. I did a quick look on them before
> diving into the logic and discussion. Below are a few minor typos found in
> version 31.

Thanks for the comments! I have fixed these typos in latest version.

Best Regards,
Hou zj

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rahila Syed 2025-05-26 07:47:46 Re: Persist injection points across server restarts
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-05-26 07:17:53 Re: JIT works only partially with meson build?