RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication

On Thursday, December 2, 2021 4:54 PM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 2, 2021 12:50 PM Amit Kapila
> <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 9:41 AM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:48 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If you updated my original description to say "(instead of just
> > > > the individual partitions)", it would imply the same I think.
> > > > But I don't mind if you want to explicitly state both cases to make it clear.
> > > >
> > >
> > > For example, something like:
> > >
> > > For publications of partitioned tables with
> > > publish_via_partition_root set to true, only the partitioned table
> > > (and not its partitions) is included in the view, whereas if
> > > publish_via_partition_root is set to false, only the individual partitions are
> included in the view.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, that sounds good to me.
>
> It looks good to me as well.
> Attach the patches for (HEAD~13) which merge the suggested doc change. I
> prepared the code patch and test patch separately to make it easier for
> committer to confirm.

It seems we might not need to backpatch the doc change, so
attach another version which remove the doc changes from backpatch patches.

Best regards,
Hou zj