RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key

From: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Date: 2021-05-24 07:58:03
Message-ID: OS0PR01MB57160A038A689354EE9D678294269@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 3:34 PM
>
> From: houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
> > I think this patch can solve the performance degradation of key
> > expression after applying the [Save the last partition] patch.
> > Besides, this could be a separate patch which can improve some more cases.
> > Thoughts ?
>
> Thank you for proposing an impressive improvement so quickly! Yes, I'm in
> the mood for adopting Amit-san's patch as a base because it's compact and
> readable, and plus add this patch of yours to complement the partition key
> function case.

Thanks for looking into this.

> But ...
>
> * Applying your patch alone produced a compilation error. I'm sorry I
> mistakenly deleted the compile log, but it said something like "There's a
> redeclaration of PartKeyContext in partcache.h; the original definition is in
> partdef.h"

It seems a little strange, I have compiled it alone in two different linux machine and did
not find such an error. Did you compile it on a windows machine ?

> * Hmm, this may be too much to expect, but I wonder if we can make the patch
> more compact...

Of course, I will try to simplify the patch.

Best regards,
houzj

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-05-24 08:01:34 Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-05-24 07:53:10 Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW