Re: Postgresql performance

From: CHEWTC(at)ap(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)sg
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql performance
Date: 2003-10-23 01:47:56
Message-ID: OF4A60A957.DA6FB09E-ON48256DC8.0009C7DB@nec.com.sg
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi

The Postgresql package came from the Redhat v9.0 CDROM.
I have checked the version using psql --version and it showed v7.3.2

The duplication of table names is in the same schema.

How to check the pg_dump version?

Thank you,
REgards.


Tom Lane
<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)u To: CHEWTC(at)ap(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)sg
s> cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgresql performance
22/10/2003 10:03
PM

CHEWTC(at)ap(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)sg writes:
> Currently we are running Postgresql v7.3.2 on Redhat Linux OS v9.0. We
have
> Windows2000 client machines inserting records into the Postgresql tables
> via ODBC.

> After a few weeks of usage, when we do a \d at the sql prompt, there was
a
> duplicate object name, ie it can be a duplicate row of index or table.
> When we do a \d table_name, it will show a duplication of column names
> inside the table.

Are you sure you are using 7.3 psql? This sounds like something that
could happen with a pre-7.3 (not schema aware) psql, if there are
multiple occurrences of the same table name in different schemas.

> It doesnt affect the insertion/updating of the tables, but when we do a
> pg_dump -Da -t <table_name> <db_name> > /exp/<table_name>.sql, it will
not
> do a proper backup/dump.

I'd wonder about whether you have the right pg_dump, too.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mario Weilguni 2003-10-23 06:14:56 Re: vacuum locking
Previous Message CHEWTC 2003-10-23 01:46:32 Re: Postgresql performance