From: | Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Russ Brown <pickscrape(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fyracle? |
Date: | 2005-06-06 14:07:54 |
Message-ID: | OF38FCAD0B.12A8356B-ON05257018.004CF35C-05257018.004DA04C@ftw.us.ray.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Some comments:
> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):
I can see skript kiddies preferring MySQL, but a DBA? Time for a
credentials review.
Firebird is a good small database (small resource footprint) that handles
small databases with many users well. It doesn't scale well due to its
single file data storage implementation. A good disk farm is mostly wasted
on it.
I think that comparing Firebird to Oracle functionality can only be done in
an extremely superficial manner because of the difference in scalability.
So they implemented PL/SQL. Whoopee. Get the source for GNAT and do it
for PostgreSQL, if anybody cares.
Rick
pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 06/06/2005 05:12:05 AM:
> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):
>
> http://www.janus-software.com/fb_fyracle.html
>
> I want to know how they've calculated the numbers that they're created
> those pie graphs from. The only thing I can think of that Postgres
> doesn't have for 'transactions' is two-phase commit, and yet it's
> given it 1/2 functionality.
>
> Anybody else care to comment?
>
> --
>
> Russ
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-06 14:08:33 | Re: Large Object => invalid input syntax for integer: "" |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-06 14:05:34 | Re: transactions |