| From: | Jayadevan M <Jayadevan(dot)Maymala(at)ibsplc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development! |
| Date: | 2010-11-18 09:46:33 |
| Message-ID: | OF1B69EB06.F21CDBFA-ON652577DF.00356229-652577DF.0035B3A7@ibsplc.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
> > PostgreSQL 9.1 is likely to have, as a feature, the ability to create
> > tables which are "unlogged", meaning that they are not added to the
> > transaction log, and will be truncated (emptied) on database restart.
> > Such tables are intended for highly volatile, but not very valuable,
> > data, such as session statues, application logs, etc.
> >
One doubt - if the tables are 'unlogged' , will the DMLs against these
still be replicated to a slave?
Regards,
Jayadevan
DISCLAIMER:
"The information in this e-mail and any attachment is intended only for
the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. If you have received this e-mail in error, kindly
contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original communication.
IBS makes no warranty, express or implied, nor guarantees the accuracy,
adequacy or completeness of the information contained in this email or any
attachment and is not liable for any errors, defects, omissions, viruses
or for resultant loss or damage, if any, direct or indirect."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | joe | 2010-11-18 12:05:50 | Compare database tables in Postgres |
| Previous Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2010-11-18 09:44:16 | Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development! |