Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node

From: "Jim Van Fleet" <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Date: 2017-11-06 17:55:20
Message-ID: OF13959435.7D59DD20-ON862581D0.0061D39B-862581D0.0062730C@notes.na.collabserv.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi --

pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote on 11/06/2017 09:47:22 AM:

> From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>

>
> Hi,
>
> Please don't top-quote on postgresql lists.
Sorry
>
> On 2017-11-06 09:44:24 -0600, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
> > > >hammerdb, in this configuration, runs a variant of tpcc
> > >
> > > Hard to believe that any of the changes here are relevant in that
> > > case - this is parallelism specific stuff. Whereas tpcc is oltp,
right?
>
> > correct
>
> In that case, could you provide before/after profiles of the performance
> changing runs?
sure -- happy to share -- gzipped files (which include trace, perf,
netstat, system data) are are large (9G and 13G)
Should I post them on the list or somewhere else (or trim them -- if so,
what would you like to have?)
>
Jim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-11-06 18:35:37 Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-11-06 17:35:13 Re: MERGE SQL Statement for PG11