RE: 4 billion record limit?

From: "Andrew Snow" <als(at)fl(dot)net(dot)au>
To: "Pgsql-General(at)Postgresql(dot) Org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: 4 billion record limit?
Date: 2000-07-27 10:58:13
Message-ID: NHEALMDKDACEIPBNOOOCGEMBCIAA.als@fl.net.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-novice


> My mistake! ;-)
> I remember wondering who would ever need more that the 16K that
> the Sinclair Spectrum could give you!

To go back to my original point about putting things in perspective -
increasing this by 2^32 would give you 68 terabytes of RAM. But if we can
get rid of oid's altogether then I think that would be best. (At least we
can make our own 64 bit serial types until they are officially implemented).

- Andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlijn van der Mee 2000-07-27 12:03:49 Problem
Previous Message Bradley Kieser 2000-07-27 10:05:36 Re: 4 billion record limit?

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message igor 2000-07-27 12:17:32 upgrade from 6.4 to 7.02 problem
Previous Message Bradley Kieser 2000-07-27 10:05:36 Re: 4 billion record limit?