Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: "Nick Fankhauser" <nickf(at)ontko(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 22:24:38
Message-ID: NEBBLAAHGLEEPCGOBHDGGEINJIAA.nickf@ontko.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

> > > Least interesting to many user perhaps, but lost of them
> > seen to think
> > > that it's important for expanding our userbase:
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=9

> > That does not say that better entertainment will attract new
> > viewers, just that the existing viewers think that.

Perhaps more compelling is this survey, which shows that 21% of the users
are on actually the win32/cygwin platform now & hence are not enjoying the
performance or ease of installation that the other 79% of us get.

http://www.postgresql.org/survey.php?View=1&SurveyID=11

-Nick

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2003-11-18 22:31:03 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-11-18 22:13:55 [Fwd: Re: Sourceforge]

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2003-11-18 22:31:03 Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
Previous Message Austin Gonyou 2003-11-18 22:19:35 Commercial binary support?