From: | "Jens Skakkebaek" <jskakkebaek(at)bv2000(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <rosner(at)scn(dot)org>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary |
Date: | 1999-12-20 00:43:50 |
Message-ID: | NDBBLCOBBMBMLKOHDKBACEJACBAA.jskakkebaek@bv2000.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Dan,
I think it would be a great idea. I have spent more than a day to try and
compile and I still haven't been able to run it (I get a
STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION when running initdb).
Having the binaries would make it so much easier for people.
Jens
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
[mailto:owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Dan Rosner
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 11:38 AM
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [PORTS] Windows NT binary
Since I'm probably not the last poor soul struggling
to build postgresql on NT, I was wondering about
the relative pros/cons of distributing the binary.
Is there an NT binary available for the current postgres
6.5.3? How much interest would there be in current
binaries if they existed?
--
Dan Rosner
Cascade Programming Group
rosner(at)scn(dot)org
************
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Lo | 1999-12-20 03:21:06 | Re: Compiling Postgres on NT |
Previous Message | Ling SHI | 1999-12-19 22:28:34 | postgresql on Solaris 2.7 |