Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary

From: "Jens Skakkebaek" <jskakkebaek(at)bv2000(dot)com>
To: <rosner(at)scn(dot)org>, <pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [PORTS] Windows NT binary
Date: 1999-12-20 00:43:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-ports

I think it would be a great idea.  I have spent more than a day to try and
compile and I still haven't been able to run it (I get a
STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION when running initdb).
Having the binaries would make it so much easier for people.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
[mailto:owner-pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Dan Rosner
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 11:38 AM
To: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [PORTS] Windows NT binary

Since I'm probably not the last poor soul struggling
to build postgresql on NT, I was wondering about
the relative pros/cons of distributing the binary.
Is there an NT binary available for the current postgres
6.5.3?  How much interest would there be in current
binaries if they existed?

Dan Rosner
Cascade Programming Group


In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Kevin LoDate: 1999-12-20 03:21:06
Subject: Re: Compiling Postgres on NT
Previous:From: Ling SHIDate: 1999-12-19 22:28:34
Subject: postgresql on Solaris 2.7

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group