RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Date: 2001-02-28 17:12:48
Message-ID: NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAOEMIINAA.ler@lerctr.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Working on it.

Give me a couple of hours.

LER

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Larry Rosenman
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?

Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.

That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-28 17:19:53 Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-28 17:04:10 Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-02-28 17:19:53 Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-28 17:04:10 Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken?