From: | "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Re: int8 beta5 broken? |
Date: | 2001-02-28 17:12:48 |
Message-ID: | NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAOEMIINAA.ler@lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Working on it.
Give me a couple of hours.
LER
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; Larry Rosenman
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Olivier PRENANT <ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr> writes:
> Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not
> used.
That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything
that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-28 17:19:53 | Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-28 17:04:10 | Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-28 17:19:53 | Re: [HACKERS] int8 beta5 broken? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-28 17:04:10 | Re: Re: int8 beta5 broken? |