Re: Postgres low end processing.

From: Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres low end processing.
Date: 2003-10-03 19:51:28
Message-ID: Mahogany-0.65.0-18418-20031003-155128.00@averillpark.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:42:54 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Postgres is bloatware by design: it was built to house PhD theses."
> -- J. Hellerstein (who ought to know)

if postgres is bloatware, what is oracle 9i?

(after i downloaded a copy of oracle 8i a couple of months back, i swore i'd
never complain about the size of postgresql ever ever again.)

richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-10-03 19:55:48 Re: PostgreSQL Beta4 Tag'd and Bundle'd ...
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-10-03 19:49:15 Re: PostgreSQL Beta4 Tag'd and Bundle'd ...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dror Matalon 2003-10-03 20:21:20 Speeding up Aggregates
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-03 19:13:51 Re: Postgres low end processing.