Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162

From: "M, Anbazhagan" <Anbazhagan(dot)M(at)netapp(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162
Date: 2026-03-05 04:13:43
Message-ID: MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-pkg-yum

We noticed that all newly uploaded packages under the RHEL 8 repos like rhel-8.8/rhel-8.9/rhel-8.10 etc. contain 8.10 in the package name, regardless of the actual minor version of that repo.

Could you confirm if this is intentional or if the package should reflect specific RHEL 8 minor version in their names?

Example:
https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/ contains rpm named as [postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm]

(https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm)

Anbazhagan M
Staff Engineer, Technical Operations
Instaclustr by Netapp

NetApp
+91-8056005329 Mobile Phone
anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com<mailto:anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com>

[NetApp logo]<https://www.netapp.com/>

[A white face with black eyes Description automatically generated]<https://netappdiscord.com/>[A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence]<https://www.facebook.com/NetApp>[NetApp on Instagram]<https://www.instagram.com/netapp/>[NetApp on LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/netapp/>[NetApp on YouTube]<https://www.youtube.com/netapp>[NetApp on X]<https://twitter.com/NetApp>

Responses

Browse pgsql-pkg-yum by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleš Zelený 2026-03-09 07:49:14 Re: Pgdg15-debuginfo inconsistent repodata
Previous Message Aleš Zelený 2026-03-04 11:13:24 Pgdg15-debuginfo inconsistent repodata