| From: | "M, Anbazhagan" <Anbazhagan(dot)M(at)netapp(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Clarification on Naming convention of the new recent packages #162 |
| Date: | 2026-03-05 04:13:43 |
| Message-ID: | MN2PR06MB6637E038DE9087619FBAF82CFF7DA@MN2PR06MB6637.namprd06.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
We noticed that all newly uploaded packages under the RHEL 8 repos like rhel-8.8/rhel-8.9/rhel-8.10 etc. contain 8.10 in the package name, regardless of the actual minor version of that repo.
Could you confirm if this is intentional or if the package should reflect specific RHEL 8 minor version in their names?
Example:
https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/15/redhat/rhel-8.9-x86_64/ contains rpm named as [postgresql15-15.17-1PGDG.rhel8.10.x86_64.rpm]
Anbazhagan M
Staff Engineer, Technical Operations
Instaclustr by Netapp
NetApp
+91-8056005329 Mobile Phone
anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com<mailto:anbazhag(at)netapp(dot)com>
[NetApp logo]<https://www.netapp.com/>
[A white face with black eyes Description automatically generated]<https://netappdiscord.com/>[A black background with a black square Description automatically generated with medium confidence]<https://www.facebook.com/NetApp>[NetApp on Instagram]<https://www.instagram.com/netapp/>[NetApp on LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/netapp/>[NetApp on YouTube]<https://www.youtube.com/netapp>[NetApp on X]<https://twitter.com/NetApp>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleš Zelený | 2026-03-09 07:49:14 | Re: Pgdg15-debuginfo inconsistent repodata |
| Previous Message | Aleš Zelený | 2026-03-04 11:13:24 | Pgdg15-debuginfo inconsistent repodata |