| From: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Outdated comments in AssignTransactionId? |
| Date: | 2022-10-25 03:36:48 |
| Message-ID: | MEYP282MB1669F1154D12464D399C5FDBB6319@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The AssignTransactionId has the following comments:
/*
* ensure this test matches similar one in
* RecoverPreparedTransactions()
*/
if (nUnreportedXids >= PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS ||
log_unknown_top)
{
...
}
However, RecoverPreparedTransactions removes this reference in 49e9281549.
Attached remove this reference in AssignTransactionId.
--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| remove-outdated-comment-in-AssignTransactionId.patch | text/x-diff | 545 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2022-10-25 03:43:43 | Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables? |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2022-10-25 03:18:11 | Re: Improve tab completion for ALTER STATISTICS |