Re: Remove redundant strlen call in ReplicationSlotValidateName

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove redundant strlen call in ReplicationSlotValidateName
Date: 2021-07-16 10:42:38
Message-ID: MEYP282MB1669AC6E54DF99948185A54EB6119@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 18:05, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:35, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > When I fix a bug about ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name) [1], Ranier Vilela
>> > finds that ReplicationSlotValidateName() has redundant strlen() call, Since it's
>> > not related to that problem, so I start a new thread to discuss it.
>
> I think this is a waste of time. The first strlen() call is just
> checking for an empty string. I imagine all compilers would just
> optimise that to checking if the first char is '\0';
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/q58EGYMfM
>

Thanks for your review, this tool is amazing. The two writes on some compiler
might be difference. As Amit Kapila said, it might be helpless for reducing
overhead.

https://godbolt.org/z/j5on6Khxb

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2021-07-16 10:55:39 Re: Remove redundant strlen call in ReplicationSlotValidateName
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2021-07-16 10:22:39 Re: [PATCH] Use optimized single-datum tuplesort in ExecSort