Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
Date: 2021-12-30 10:44:23
Message-ID: MEYP282MB16691948486874FBB3686898B6459@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 17:18, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been reading the autovacuum code (the launcher and the worker) on the
> 14 branch. As previously, I've seen some configuration at the beginning,
> especially for statement_timeout, lock_timeout and
> idle_in_transaction_session_timeout, and I was surprised to discover there
> was no configuration for idle_session_timeout. I'm not sure the code should
> set it to 0 as well (otherwise I'd have written a patch), but, if there was
> a decision made to ignore its value, I'd be interested to know the reason.
> I could guess for the autovacuum worker (it seems to work in a transaction,
> so it's already handled by the idle_in_transaction_timeout), but I have no
> idea for the autovacuum launcher.
>
> If it was just missed, I could write a patch this week to fix this.
>

Oh, it was just missed. I didn't note set autovacuum code set those settings,
I think we should also set idle_session_timeout to 0.

Should we also change this for pg_dump and pg_backup_archiver?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2021-12-30 10:53:37 Re: Autovacuum and idle_session_timeout
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-30 09:43:30 Re: Non-decimal integer literals