From: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: log_min_messages per backend type |
Date: | 2025-07-31 23:34:12 |
Message-ID: | ME0P300MB04459538922993E1BD0DC051B627A@ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 18:51, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2025-Aug-01, Japin Li wrote:
>
>> If we set the log level for all backend types, I don't think a generic log
>> level is necessary.
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you elaborate?
>
For example:
ALTER SYSTEM SET log_min_messages TO
'archiver:info, autovacuum:info, backend:info, bgworker:info, bgwriter:info, checkpointer:info, ioworker:info, logger:info, slotsyncworker:info, startup:info, walreceiver:info, walsender:info, walsummarizer:info, walwriter:info';
Given that we've set a log level for every backend type and
assigned[BACKEND_NUM_TYPES] is true, a generic level seems redundant.
--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-07-31 23:40:33 | Re: Convert varatt.h macros to static inline functions |
Previous Message | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM | 2025-07-31 23:31:17 | Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in pg_buffercache_pages while scanning the buffers |