Re: log_min_messages per backend type

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_min_messages per backend type
Date: 2025-07-31 23:34:12
Message-ID: ME0P300MB04459538922993E1BD0DC051B627A@ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 18:51, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> On 2025-Aug-01, Japin Li wrote:
>
>> If we set the log level for all backend types, I don't think a generic log
>> level is necessary.
>
> I don't understand what you mean by this. Can you elaborate?
>
For example:

ALTER SYSTEM SET log_min_messages TO
'archiver:info, autovacuum:info, backend:info, bgworker:info, bgwriter:info, checkpointer:info, ioworker:info, logger:info, slotsyncworker:info, startup:info, walreceiver:info, walsender:info, walsummarizer:info, walwriter:info';

Given that we've set a log level for every backend type and
assigned[BACKEND_NUM_TYPES] is true, a generic level seems redundant.

--
Regards,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-07-31 23:40:33 Re: Convert varatt.h macros to static inline functions
Previous Message SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM 2025-07-31 23:31:17 Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in pg_buffercache_pages while scanning the buffers