Re: Errors after power failure

From: "Daniel E(dot) Fisher" <danfisher(at)bwkip(dot)com>
To: "PGSQL List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Errors after power failure
Date: 2004-01-15 17:47:53
Message-ID: JIEIIHOALIEKONPOODGLKEGHCFAA.danfisher@bwkip.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

If I could kiss you I would.

Everything is working now.

Apparently an old script I had was switched and you were right...the old
script was
not starting tcp connections....so...I enabled it in the postgresql.conf and
it is ok

Thank You

-Dan

Thanks for everyones help!!

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Adrian Klaver
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 11:19 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Errors after power failure

I would suspect the manner in which it was started. Does your
postresql.conf
file have tcpip_socket=true?. If it is set to false and the script that
starts Postgres does not use the '-o -i' switch then the database will not
accept tcpip connections. Have you tried psql on the database host to see if
it can accept local connections via a unix socket?

On Thursday 15 January 2004 08:16 am, danfisher(at)bwkip(dot)com wrote:
> Heres what is get with nmap localhost
>
> pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
> [root(at)database root]# nmap localhost
>
> Starting nmap V. 3.00 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
> Interesting ports on database (127.0.0.1):
> (The 1590 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
> Port State Service
> 21/tcp open ftp
> 22/tcp open ssh
> 25/tcp open smtp
> 80/tcp open http
> 111/tcp open sunrpc
> 443/tcp open https
> 783/tcp open hp-alarm-mgr
> 1024/tcp open kdm
> 1025/tcp open NFS-or-IIS
> 6000/tcp open X11
> 10000/tcp open snet-sensor-mgmt
>
> Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2 seconds
> [root(at)database root]#
>
> And I doublechecked to make sure postmaster was running
>
>
> Here is what is in the log file
>
>
> LOG: database system was shut down at 2004-01-15 11:22:01 EST
> LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/AF6940
> LOG: redo record is at 0/AF6940; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
> LOG: next transaction id: 2676; next oid: 25169
> LOG: database system is ready
>
> -Dan
>
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 danfisher(at)bwkip(dot)com wrote:
> >> I have deleted the pid and restarted the postgresql and it is starting
> >> fine. It just appears to not be accepting connections. I had to
> >> rebuild the server the last time this happened. Starting to be a
> >> pain.
> >
> > Firewalling maybe? Check which ports are open with nmap.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Glaesemann 2004-01-15 17:47:55 Re: Bug and/or feature? Complex data types in tables...
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2004-01-15 17:35:06 Re: Bytea/Large Objects/external files best practices