Re: Suggestion for optimization

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, "Barry Lind" <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for optimization
Date: 2002-04-08 02:05:08
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEABCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Af far as I know Oracle doesn't have any short cut (along the lines of
> > what is being discussed in this thread) for this operation. However
> > Oracle is more efficient in providing the answer than postgres
> currently
> > is. While postgres needs to perform a full scan on the table, Oracle
> > will only need to perform a full index scan on the primary key if one
> > exists. Since the index will likely have much less data than the full
>
> Under Postgres, a full index scan is generally more expensive than a full
> table scan since indices, particularly btree, carry a large amount of meta
> data and theefore consume more pages.

Don't forget that Postgres also doesn't store tids in the index, so must
always check with the main table that a row is visible in current
transaction.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-04-08 02:17:59 Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-08 01:13:17 Re: Question on ident authorization