Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joel Burton" <joel(at)joelburton(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "mlw" <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: 2002-05-06 01:43:37
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEHCCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Rather than propagating the SysV semaphore API still further, why don't
> > we kill it now? (I'm willing to keep the shmem API, however.)
>
> Would this have the benefit of allow PostgreSQL to work properly in BSD
> jails, since lack of really working SysV IPC was the problem there?

I have postgresql working quite happily in FreeBSD jails! (Just make sure
you go "sysctl jail.sysvipc_allowed=1").

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-06 01:48:24 Re: Number of attributes in HeapTupleHeader
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-05-06 01:13:26 Re: STILL LACKING: CVS tag for release 7.2.1