Re: BLOB

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Manuel Cabido" <manny(at)tinago(dot)msuiit(dot)edu(dot)ph>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BLOB
Date: 2002-09-19 02:42:14
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEENCEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I would like to inquire how is the BLOB support in
> PostgreSQL is doing
> > now? Had there been some improvements? Can I have the blob
> support like in
>
> I'm unsure about blob (didn't know we had a blob type), but bytea works
> perfectly fine for that.

Is there some reason why we didn't call text 'clob' and bytea 'blob'? or at
least add aliases?

Chris

In response to

  • Re: BLOB at 2002-09-19 00:12:27 from Rod Taylor

Responses

  • Re: BLOB at 2002-09-19 21:38:07 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-19 03:14:20 Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-19 02:34:32 Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items)