Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in
Date: 2002-08-22 01:48:04
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOKENCCDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > If we are going to delay beta, we should decide now, not at the end of
> > August, and the delay should be until the end of September. The big
> > question is whether we have enough material to warrant a delay.
>
> Beta goes down in 1 week ... if we follow what we had talked about before,
> within a short period of time after beta, we should be able to let ppl
> dive into working on v7.4 (or 8.0, whatever we decide to call it) ... but
> let's try and stick to a timeline for once, else we are going to hit the
> same as the last *very* extended release ...

I'd much rather see 7.3 as-is then an 8.0 not so later on with win32 native
and PITR _properly_tested_.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-22 01:58:24 Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2002-08-22 01:39:58 Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in