Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date: 2002-09-17 08:04:38
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOIEEECEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> I use PostgreSQL on Linux for production and XP for development, and am
> likely to continue that way. I've been beta testing the native Win32
> port of PostgreSQL as Justin has and the latest version is fantastic -
> it runs as a service, osdb shows impressive results compared to Cygwin
> PostgreSQL on the same system and it's a breeze to install, despite
> there being no installer yet.

>From where do we get this fabled Win32 port?

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wim 2002-09-17 08:11:41 Still big problems with pg_dump!
Previous Message Andy Samuel 2002-09-17 07:54:06 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wim 2002-09-17 08:11:41 Still big problems with pg_dump!
Previous Message Andy Samuel 2002-09-17 07:54:06 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info