| From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Neil Conway" <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items ) |
| Date: | 2002-08-01 01:36:54 |
| Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOGEHECDAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Mentioning that on -hackers would have been nice -- I've spent a while
> this week hacking autoconf / Makefiles to integrate libpqxx...
>
> The problem I have with removing libpqxx is that libpq++ is a far
> inferior C++ interface. If we leave libpq++ as the only C++ interface
> distributed with PostgreSQL, there will be a tendancy for people
> using PostgreSQL & C++ to use the C++ support included with the
> distribution. Similarly, the Perl interface included with
> PostgreSQL is widely regarded as inferior to DBD::Pg.
I think that if someone is actually working on libpqxx integration - then
yeah, leave it in...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-08-01 01:38:47 | Trimming the Fat, Part Deux ... |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2002-08-01 01:27:51 | Re: Rules and Views |