Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Paul Eggert" <eggert(at)twinsun(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts
Date: 2002-03-12 02:35:35
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOAELGCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> But the parts that are replacing 'head -1' by 'sed q' should definitely be
> applied. Although I'd prefer 'sed 1q'.

What's wrong with "head -n 1"?? Surely that's compliant if -num params
aren't allowed any more?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-12 03:25:27 Re: Domain Support -- another round
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-12 02:21:27 Re: support for POSIX 1003.1-2001 hosts