Re: surrogate key or not?

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon(at)thenilgiris(dot)com>
Cc: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: surrogate key or not?
Date: 2004-07-23 09:59:33
Message-ID: FF7F62AC-DC8E-11D8-AA48-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


On Jul 23, 2004, at 4:57 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:

> On Friday 23 July 2004 12:27 pm, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
>> BTW, our full schema is here:
>>
>> http://www.hherb.com/gnumed/schema/
>
> i was looking at your schema. i'm not a database pro, but in master
> tables i
> see you have made the serial id as the primary key. i do it this way:
>
> id serial unique
> name varchar(25) not null
> primary key is name - after all, you are going to search this on name
> arent
> you? or is there some advantage in doing it your way?

Kenneth,

You appear to be misunderstanding the purpose of a primary key. A
primary key is used to ensure there is a way to identify each row
uniquely. It is quite independent of which columns you may or may not
want to search on. If name is not going to be necessarily unique in the
table, it isn't a primary key.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Gonsalves 2004-07-23 10:02:53 Re: surrogate key or not?
Previous Message Kenneth Gonsalves 2004-07-23 09:00:10 Re: surrogate key or not?