Re: Bgwriter LRU cleaning: we've been going at this all wrong

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bgwriter LRU cleaning: we've been going at this all wrong
Date: 2007-06-29 13:07:34
Message-ID: FF080A7B-9AFE-4E7E-96FF-D7048048D70D@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
>> It might be good to use statistics information about buffer usage
>> to modify X runtime.
>
> I have a complete set of working code that tracks buffer usage
> statistics as the background writer scans, so that it has an idea
> what % of the buffer cache is dirty, how many pages have each of
> the various usage counts, that sort of thing. The problem was that
> the existing BGW mechanisms were so clumsy and inefficient that
> giving them more information didn't make them usefully smarter.
> I'll revive that code again if it looks like it may help here.

Even if it's not used by bgwriter for self-tuning, having that
information available would be very useful for anyone trying to hand-
tune the system.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2007-06-29 13:09:30 pg_dump and minor versions
Previous Message Theo Schlossnagle 2007-06-29 12:33:43 Re: [PATCHES] Doc update for pg_start_backup