From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | 'Tim Finch' <pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Mark A(dot) Taff" <mark(at)libertycreek(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: table OCX control |
Date: | 2002-03-08 20:20:51 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047684@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Finch [mailto:pgadmin(at)timfinch(dot)cix(dot)co(dot)uk]
> Sent: 08 March 2002 11:37
> To: Mark A. Taff
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] table OCX control
>
>
> In fact if we came up with a method of doing it Registry wise then
> something like the view designer could determine its own
> 'hives' and 'keys'
> and not care how, for example, the left hand tree view in
> pgAdmin stores
> its own project related settings. What do you think Dave/Jean?
Hmm, you saw my earlier thoughts on this. Keep it optional, keep it simple.
I guess the best bet would be to come up with a spec proposal for us all to
consider. It might be worth keeping the Projects to-do item in mind while
developing this - as one of you said, it is related. Jean-Michel might have
some comments on that - it's his to-do item.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Finch | 2002-03-09 11:10:09 | Re: table OCX control |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-03-08 20:15:56 | Re: CVS, MArk & Tim testing |