From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr'" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: fake vs real CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW |
Date: | 2002-02-26 08:40:48 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047611@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr]
> Sent: 26 February 2002 08:09
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] fake vs real CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW
>
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> + create "view_a" querying "view_b",
> + alter "view_b",
> = "view_a "is broken because "view_b" changed OIDs.
Yes. I thought I suggested adding a warning to that effect at one time.
> This to say we really need CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW in
> PostgreSQL. Do you
> remember the email of the developper who proposed to add this
> feature to
> PostgreSQL? Could you contact him off the list to ask if this
> is still on his
> agenda?
It was Gavin Sherry I think, but I'm not going to hassle him about it, he
specifically said he wasn't going to do it immediately.
How's the ALTER VIEW patch coming along btw?
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-26 08:46:37 | Re: Database->ServerEncoding, ClientEncoding |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-02-26 08:17:33 | Re: pgAdmin2 Japanese display |