From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr'" <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support |
Date: | 2002-02-25 11:33:48 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB1047604@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr]
> Sent: 25 February 2002 11:25
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support
>
>
> Le Lundi 25 Février 2002 10:55, Dave Page a écrit :
> > Does it matter? I thought it was the client encoding that
> mattered: I
> > would guess that it should be set to EUC_JP.
>
> Yes, it matters. EUC_JP is a unix encoding. It will never
> display under
> Windows.
Yes, but my point is that setting the client encoding on the server worked
for latin, so would the same work for EUC_JP? Following other emails though,
I assume not because the PCs are already in latin1 and that is the big
difference?
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-25 11:50:26 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-25 11:29:13 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-25 11:50:26 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-25 11:29:13 | Re: [ODBC] pgAdmin2 UTF-8 support |