From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org'" <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
Date: | 2001-12-13 09:54:57 |
Message-ID: | FED2B709E3270E4B903EB0175A49BCB104735F@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org]
> Sent: 13 December 2001 05:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'; 'pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin
>
>
> > Having heard nothing on the list yet about the reported
> unsuccessful
> > parallel regression tests on Cygwin with 7.2b3, I thought
> I'd have a
> > play myself having found a spare few minutes.
>
> Tom Lane has speculated that some optimizations around our
> locking code (which had been redone for 7.2) might be the
> culprit for problems in Cygwin as it apparently was for AIX.
> He has since fixed the problems at least under AIX.
>
> Could you repeat the test with 7.2b4 (out today??)?.
>
Still the same problem :-(. BTW: I have also updated my Cygwin installation
to
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 PC20 1.3.6(0.47/3/2) 2001-12-08 17:02 i686 unknown
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-12-13 12:32:59 | Re: Platform Testing - Cygwin |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-13 05:57:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Platform Testing - Cygwin |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-13 10:35:02 | Re: Intermediate report for AIX 5L port |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-12-13 07:11:35 | Re: Third call for platform testing |