Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows

From: "Andrus" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee>
To: "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Adrian Klaver" <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hot standby from Debian to Windows
Date: 2020-03-30 06:35:17
Message-ID: FC0203DE66EB42BAAC8EFB0AE3979C90@dell2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi!

>Would it not be easier to just set up another Debian server, run binary
>replication

Breaks occurs rarely, 0-2 times per year.
I want try it first.

> and put them behind something like pgpool?

Backup server will use single core and minimal RAM. It may be needed 0-2
times per year.

pgpool should switch to use it for production work only if main server does
not respond.
I havent found this feature in pgpool documentation (maybe missed).

Andrus.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2020-03-30 08:30:43 Re: Issue with Postgres process startup after instance restart
Previous Message Aisar Afif Ahmad Norzan 2020-03-30 05:33:35 Uploading existing shapefile from geoserver to postgresql