Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris

From: "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NFS vs. PostgreSQL on Solaris
Date: 2007-04-30 19:14:38
Message-ID: FB50821A-AC96-420B-AD63-53221B2FE5A8@o.ptimized.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com> writes:
>> 1. What aspect of postgres' memory usage would create an "out of
>> memory" condition?
>
> I'm guessing you ran the box out of swap space --- look into what
> other
> processes got started as a result of adding the NFS mount, and how
> much
> memory they wanted to eat.
>
>> 3. What would cause postgres to die from a signal 11?
>> I've also got a core file if that's necessary for further forensics.
>
> Send gdb backtrace, please.
>
> regards, tom lane

Unfortunately, the production build in question is lacking --enable-
debug. :(

--
Thomas F. O'Connell

optimizing modern web applications
: for search engines, for usability, and for performance :

http://o.ptimized.com/
615-260-0005

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Allison 2007-04-30 19:28:08 pgsql and Mac OS X
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2007-04-30 19:01:50 Re: Questions about TSearch2 and PG 8.2