Re: Quick Extensions Question

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quick Extensions Question
Date: 2011-03-05 18:13:06
Message-ID: FAB87DAC-3329-4AD4-A0AE-2EAF6C797216@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> On reflection I think it makes no sense at all to leave those tools
> issuing CREATE/DROP LANGUAGE. We want to move people over to managing
> languages via extensions, and leaving those tools unchanged will not
> serve that goal. However, I don't mind labeling them as deprecated
> and not troubling to point out that they could be used for installing
> non-PL extensions.

+1 I think this is the sane thing to do in the short run. It remains to be seen whether a createext type tool is even necessary.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-03-05 18:23:42 Re: Replication server timeout patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-05 18:03:56 Re: Quick Extensions Question