Re: Patch to install config/missing

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to install config/missing
Date: 2015-11-02 22:46:44
Message-ID: FA492AB8-D780-411C-AE17-601BE0699CBE@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 2, 2015, at 1:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wonder how much we need that script at all though. If, say, configure
> doesn't find bison, what's so wrong with just defining BISON=bison and
> letting the usual shell "bison: command not found" error leak through?

+1 This would certainly make it easier for downstream use cases, as well. Was not relishing having to parse the PERL variable to find out if Perl was missing.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-11-02 23:09:19 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-02 22:28:09 Re: WIP: Rework access method interface