Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: "Vianen, Jeroen van" <jeroen(dot)van(dot)vianen(at)satama(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-18 08:20:30
Message-ID: F9926D32A30ED511B8E30050044AB52E1014AE@ams010.satama.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Cramer [mailto:Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 03:17
> To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] [PATCHES] Ant configuration
>
>
> Given that ant is (or is becoming) the defacto standard for building
> java apps I am reluctant to remove it. A number of projects simply
> include the ant jar in the download.

And why not include the postgresql.jar in the download as well? Problem
solved for most people. Preferably even separate jar files for jdbc1 and
jdbc2.

I vote for keeping ant support as well.

Jeroen

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message root 2001-10-18 14:26:59 problem with Chinese
Previous Message Kovács Péter 2001-10-18 08:15:37 Re: JDBC 2 ResultSet and cursors