Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and

From: "Richard P(dot) Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
To: "Reko Turja" <reko(dot)turja(at)liukuma(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Date: 2006-02-13 03:04:22
Message-ID: F8F564F6-A131-4C3B-BD71-F78C395C57D4@averillpark.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On Feb 12, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Reko Turja wrote:

>> I'm using Sleepycat's copyleft licensing
>> option, and nobody can take that copy away from me. Your mail
>> servers
>> are probably similar: the copyleft license you already have is good
>> enough.

> It think the GNU licensing has already been once revoked from
> bottom up in US court of law and that might be used as preliminary
> case if Oracle wants to press the issue. BSD-licensing is harder to
> hit that way, but GPL believability in OSS might be hit hard.

i've not heard this before about GPL and find it a little hard to
believe that something of this importance could happen without
becoming common knowledge. i'm not a huge fan of the GPL, but this
sounds somewhat fudish as presented.

> (the pointers to the case in question can be found somewhere on
> FreeBSD website - topic was comparation of BSD and GPL licenses)

i think you need to provide these. the freebsd website
is quite large.

richard
--
Richard P. Welty
rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net 518-269-8232

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-02-13 03:28:27 Re: Oracle buying Sleepycat, JBoss, and
Previous Message Mike Ellsworth 2006-02-13 02:15:28 Re: PostgreSQL ad images