Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows

From: Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date: 2016-11-03 13:31:07
Message-ID: F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB546DC@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Change "even large" to "even larger" because it is used in a comparison.

> ... a reasonable starting value for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> is 25%
> of the memory in your system. There are some workloads where even large settings
> for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> are effective, ...

... are some workloads where even larger settings ...

Regards,
Brad DeJong

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-11-03 13:31:20 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Abbas Butt 2016-11-03 12:18:53 Re: Using a latch between a background worker process and a thread