Re: Fix pg_get_multixact_stats() members_size calculation

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, nagnrik(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Fix pg_get_multixact_stats() members_size calculation
Date: 2026-05-26 05:17:25
Message-ID: F8B5E2F7-E06A-4FB7-8CE0-1EB6FDD0BC29@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On May 26, 2026, at 12:53, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:30:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Surprising it is. I'll double-check tomorrow. Thanks.
>
> The test on HEAD was a bit incorrect; it included three checks based
> on offsets that did not make sense as the value is not reported in the
> function. I guess that this was just an incorrect rebase, that we've
> missed when the patch got merged.
>
> There was also a typo in the test, which I have fixed while on it.
>
> Done as of 6aa26be288fa. Thanks.
> --
> Michael

Thanks for taking care of this patch.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-05-26 05:20:52 Re: NULL pointer dereference in syslogger with load_libraries() and -DEXEC_BACKEND at startup
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-05-26 04:53:10 Re: Fix pg_get_multixact_stats() members_size calculation