Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Intel Macs and PostgreSQL

From: Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Intel Macs and PostgreSQL
Date: 2006-01-11 23:39:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
A friend of mine built 8.1.2 today on an Intel transition kit Mac and  
he said it built and make check worked perfectly. Hopefully that  
means the database will work. I'm sure it will.

Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |  brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com

ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
Calgary, AB  T2G 0V9

On Jan 11, 2006, at 4:23 AM, Sean Davis wrote:

> On 1/11/06 2:13 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Brendan Duddridge <brendan(at)clickspace(dot)com> writes:
>>> Does anyone know if PostgreSQL 8.1.x will work on the new Intel  
>>> Macs?
>> If it doesn't, send a patch ;-)
>> We work fine on Intel hardware, and on Darwin, so I'd expect at most
>> very minor issues getting it to work on Darwin/Intel.  But I can't  
>> deny
>> that this is a trail not yet blazed.
> Isn't PostgreSQL used by the newest versions of the system  
> (10.4.x)?  If not
> by default, it is available for some extensions, I think.  See here:
> So, I think apple may have an interest in making sure that it does  
> work, but
> I'm WAY outside the thought processes of large computer companies.
> Sean
> ---------------------------(end of  
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-12 03:21:40
Subject: Re: Sequential Scans On Complex Query With UNION - see why this fails
Previous:From: Michael GlaesemannDate: 2006-01-11 23:37:35
Subject: Re: Sequential Scans On Complex Query With UNION - see why this fails

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group